Thursday, June 18, 2009

Spring Hill Cemetery - Charleston, WV

To get to the old cemetery, you have to pull off the highway sharply and with gut. From the middle lane, you must reach and leap for the exit, traffic be damned. As your car dives, midway, you wonder whether you’ve missed an oncoming Walmart truck that any reasonable adult should have seen and whether, in another half second, you will realize your carelessness as you are mashed into the pavement, your personness wiped out of your body. Or maybe you’ll land and go about the rest of your afternoon with your usual nonchalance, which is, after all, how you generally spend afternoons. Suddenly, the spin of the ramp says that you’ve made it, and you hold onto that turn with every available tendon until you’ve passed through it: a revolving door into a quiet, wild place.

The road coils and climbs, steeper than you remember hills to be. Little squat houses jab into the sides like hastily placed pins that hold up a woman’s chignon for an evening. While she dances and laughs, she feels the danger that they will give a sigh and give up, letting her slippery black hair splash onto her neck.

You find a row of porched houses, hunkering together by the road -- afraid of the mountain's empty space. You peer into the windows, wondering who built them and who lives there now. This is the unfashionable side of town with a view of the city's vacant warehouses. A young man in a dirty t-shirt opens a screen door to get something out of his parked car. A satellite dish balances on the side of a porch roof. The house on the end belongs to a whimsical woman with a well-loved cat. She has wicker porch furniture and lavendar cushions and a glass and iron wind chime that she got from her friend who is an artist. You can see your mother living in a house like this.

You drive through gates and up to an office with a terracotta roof. Nobody answers the sound of you coming in, and you hear people in the back arguing over the details of a burial package.

"So, you're telling me that the only ones we can get together in the family area are between Aunt Gertie and Aunt Mildred?"

"Looks like it."

"I would die."

"I don't think that'll be a problem."

"You're impossible. This is serious. I knew I should've come myself."

"I just meant that you won't care where you are. You'll be dead. Why don't we take the papers and look them over at home. We're taking up too much of her time."

"Fine."

A well-dressed couple in their 60's come through the office. You smile a vague nice-weather-we're-having smile, and they leave quickly.

On the shelves are bound and stamped books called, “Death Book,” “Mausoleum I, II, and IV,” and “Pending Sales.” You think about asking for a map but don’t want to mark yourself as a tourist; the kind of person who seeks out her own ancestors and joins internet sites for this purpose and enshrines her findings in a scrapbook and politely tolerates the living locals.

Before you can leave, a woman comes out of the back and sizes you up as exactly this. “Can I help you, honey?” she asks.

“Well. Um. Yes. Could you tell me how old the cemetery is?”

“Well, we’ve got records dating back to 1900 or so.” She waits for you to make another demand and then asks, “You looking for someone in particular?”

“No. I was just curious.”

The woman looks at you, trying to place the kind of person who wanders around an out-of-the-way cemetery on a Monday afternoon, alone, with no people to seek out. She points to the mausoleum, which pretends to be Italian with its dome and matching terracotta roof. Above the door, a stone reads, “A.D. 1910.” She says, “The mausoleum has been here since about 1910.”

“OK.”

You stare at each other. You consider offering her an invented ancestor -- a ne'er do well who ran off with a three ring circus.

Instead, you say, “Thank you,” as if this were the very fact you needed to know.

You start up one of the asphalt roads. The oldest part comes first. It grows uphill, working its way though Christian names from 1815, when people were careful to write that they had come from England and to engrave the stones with bits of scripture in snaking script. It was important to be from somewhere, to be someone’s wife or daughter, and to leave the world with something to think about. Maybe these things are still important. You notice Civil War death dates and the font become crisp and modern in the '20s. You wander up through the steady flow of lives and deaths, though two World Wars, working your way up through the 20th Century, remembering dates and events from your history textbook, trying to place them next to these small lives.

At the top, the Catholics added their own section. An iron and bronze sign tells who assisted with the consecration of the land and which seminary students won out on the vying for this honor. At the bottom, it says the land had been "blessed and dedicated to the memory of loved ones on one of the warmest days of the year." The phrase strikes you as foolish and earnest. It mattered to someone that the day be remembered. Someone wanted to wrap the dead in the cottony air of late summer. And inside the line, you sense a joke played on the priests and their protégés as they suffered in their wool though ninety-five-degree sunshine to honor the absent and indifferent dead.

The road winds down around to the oldest part. Five men run tractors through the grass aisles, chopping through the daisies and dandelion puffs that grow ragged over the bulwarks between family plots. As fast as they cut, the weeds rebound and reclaim their places. The wild place elbows for more room.

You remember the clean-shaven ground of the cemetery back home. There, people carve places for the dead between but apart from the places for living. The dead just move across town and become drive-by sites on your commute -- wandering places for eccentrics and havens for drug-seeking kids. People come and talk to the stones and leave flowers, and a custodian keeps things. We keep our losses close, dropping by when we need to feel sad or afraid.

Here, death has been sent out and away to the hill to keep an eye on things. But before your eyes, the careless wild is taking over. The edges of the yard soften as the woods chew at them. Flat plates of leaves reach toward the fresh-mowed lanes. Weeds and seedlings sprout between headstones, pushing up past where the obelisks can reach, dwarfing them and mocking these puny man-towers.

Grasses throw themselves across the waist of a small headstone for an unnamed infant son whose life is listed in months and days the way a mother tells her baby’s age to a friendly stranger in the produce section of the grocery store. It hurts. The rain and sun suck the engraved verses out of the stones so that you can barely read them. They do not matter.

Crows and blue jays call out for their rightful piece of wood. A beaver wanders out of the bushes, evaluates the scene, and sleepy, sighs as she turns back and wraps herself in the living green to wait. She is patient. Soon, we will melt back into the hillside and be carried in earthworm gut into the nearest stream or tree or dandelion weed. Some child will pick us up, blow on our feathered seeds, and watch us fly, amazed, imagining where we will land.

You watch the men ravage the dandelion weeds with motors, knives, and poison cans. The city pays them well to fight back this life. To keep it neat, trimmed, and polite. Protecting a death that’s up and away, out of sight, keeping an eye on things. One of the men smiles. "It's a hot one today," he says. You nod. The blue jays laugh.

Tuesday, April 7, 2009

March Tuesday

I remember dismembering
spiral paper flakes
with a yellow pencil blade --
in secret,
flicking them
into stale air
to twist down
until they disappear
or endure
torture
into the night
shift’s plastic blue bin,
while through the window
into the morning
I plan my escape.

Thursday, March 12, 2009

Are Baby Vampires Poisonous?

If you have contact with the world of 13-year-old girls and don't have some kind of debilitating nervous disorder that prevents you from absorbing information from your environment, then you must have noticed the Twilight books. For months, teen and tween girls have been giving themselves shoulder problems, carrying around these 800-page novels, ferreting them off to bedrooms to be devoured and then savored in an immediate rereading. They tape pictures of Edward, the vampire hearthrob, in their lockers, they giggle knowingly about Edward's bad-boy edge and sigh over his sweet and selfless protectiveness.

Twilight and the fan clubs surrounding it are part of a private teen girl world in which parents are awkward transgressors. Most parents don't read along with their children. They read book reviews, piece together the advice of friends and teachers, and do their best. "A teenage girl falling in love with a vampire boy and then they have vampire sex and a vampire baby who isn't really a vampire but tries against her will to kill her mother anyway? Well, at least they're reading."

I first became aware of the books when a mother of twin 12-year-old girls asked my opinion of their appropriateness. The mom's friend had recommended the books as a summer read, and then, a few weeks later, had left a frantic voicemail for the mother. "Don't let them read any more! In the 4th book, they have vampire sex! And she gets pregnant!!" What did I think? Well, I've been known to enjoy horrible teen girl entertainment. I've seen The Princess Diaries (1 and 2), Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants (1 and 2), High School Musical (just 1), etc. So, committing to 2,000 pages of vampire lit didn't sound too painful.

Twilight is addicting. It's a drug that you know is beneath you. It's like crack or cheap chocolate or watching The Hills at the gym. I stayed home on a Friday night to finish New Moon then called my friend (a grown woman) to commiserate about how much more we both liked Jacob the werewolf than Edward the vampire. Jacob was kind of human and his clothes kept coming off when he morphed and, as an American Indian, he was in touch with nature and spirituality, and he was snarky and funny, and he could give her a kind of normal life with kids and a house and everything, except for the prowling the woods as a wolf thing. Way better than Edward, a cheesy piano-playing stalker who shows up unannounced and secretly watches you while you sleep and actually wants to eat you. Later that week, I overheard a fierce debate between two seventh-grade girls about just this question. It made me wonder why all of us were so wrapped up in this story. Even as we laughed at ourselves for caring, we stayed up late with the books, read them over our cereal, and cared genuinely how they would end.

Twilight stars Bella, an abnormally bland girl, who has next to no personality of her own. She's pale and quiet and a good cook but doesn't care about cooking. Her most defining feature is that she is a new student at her school who doesn't want to participate in the teen world before her. She seems to be beyond that. Bella only becomes interesting when she meets and attracts Edward, an overtly brooding and irresistible boy in her class. They fall in love. Luckily for Bella, it turns out that Edward is a sweet, perfect boyfriend... you know, underneath the vampire stuff. Bella seems to be the aggressor in their relationship, begging him to turn her into a vampire and then striking a bargain that will allow her to experience sex as a human before she changes. He's the one who insists on marriage first.

Critics have focused on the sexual messages implicit in vampire stories and figured in the author's Mormon beliefs to conclude that the books are a morality tale about premarital sex. Waiting makes it better. Some parents are troubled by the whole subject, but the truth is that all vampire stories carry implicit messages about sex. Dracula seduces his female prey, and their attraction to him kills them. So, young women, stay away from worldy, charming men.

Here's the problem with Twilight: classic vampires like Nosferatu and Dracula are sexy and dangerous. In Twilight, the danger part gets buried because Edward's love for Bella makes him able to resist his dark nature. So Bella (and we readers) ignore the danger and root for Edward to take away her life so that they can be together. Yeah, he's a vampire, but he's a vegetarian and basically a good guy, so it's OK that he does things worthy of restraining orders: sneaking into Bella's room to watch her sleep without her knowledge, asking his sister to watch Bella and then kidnap her when he has to go out of town, brooding about his lack of self-control, which beat Bella to a pulp on their wedding night. Bella forgives him for these things because it's clear that he has her best interst at heart. Yeah, I saw that Lifetime special too.

What scares me is how easy it is for us to fall for Edward and to dismiss Bella's human life. Her crippling need for Edward is more exciting than anything else in her character. At several points in the books, I was struck by phrases like, "I remembered when I'd met him -- when my life had truly begun." She can't believe that someone as wonderful as Edward would be interested in her, and neither can we. Why are we so willing to accept and even identify with a thinly disguised helpless waif of a heroine?

In Eclipse, when Edward abandons Bella (in order to protect her from life as a vampire), Bella tumbles into depression. What little spark she had brought to the story disappears, and she becomes an empty shell, going through the motions of her life. Without Edward, she doesn't matter. That is, until she meets another guy to lean on. Jacob, Bella's werewolf best friend, falls in love with her and becomes the "sun" in her otherwise dark universe. And we sigh with relief -- at least she has someone.

In the fourth book, Breaking Dawn, Bella finally puts her foot down. After the wedding, before she becomes a vampire, she becomes pregnant with Edward's half-vampire baby. The baby is taking Bella's life as it grows, starving her, breaking her bones, and eventually causing internal hemmhoraging. It's a slightly exaggerated version of real pregnancy. When Edward and his family see what's happening to Bella, they want to "get it out of her," but Bella nobly refuses, preparing to sacrifice herself for the half-vampire baby. This tendency to sacrifice self has been part of Bella all along, but it's been directed toward Edward. In the fourth book, she grows from a self-sacrificing girlfriend to a self-sacrificing wife and mother. It's the main thing that she does. Frankly, I'm disappointed. Even if Edward is willing to settle for Bella, should we? And should it bother us that tween girls do?

In The Atlantic's December issue, Caitlin Flanagan describes the private quality and developmental importance of reading to girls of this age. http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200812/twilight-vampires As Flanagan writes, we (girls) explore romance and sexuality by reading about them, trying on the lives of the characters that we read about and identify with. We dive into books -- all kinds of books -- with abandon and vulnerability. We still haven't caught on that the sweetest, most innocent characters will be killed off, and we're truly, honestly angry if the heroine rejects her rightful hero. I remember growling at my copy of Little Women from my airplane seat when Jo turned down Laurie. I still haven't forgiven her.

When I ask 13-year-old girls about the appeal of the Twilight books, they blush. I suppose they know that many adults don't approve of them reading about vampire sex and half-vampire babies. But then, as they describe Edward and compare him to Jacob, they come alive. They describe the rules of the vampire world with finesse and precision. When you become a vampire, you become a more beautiful and perfect version of yourself. Talents that you have as a human are magnified. Werewolves and vampires have been enemies for centuries, but they can learn how to live in peace. Half-vampire babies are really cute and powerful but not poisonous. Well, the girls aren't. The boys are.

But if you ask them to evaluate Bella's character and her relationship with Edward, they retreat with a shrug. "It's just a fantasy. It's not real."

How real is our fantasy life in our teens? What do we absorb, and what do we ignore? Are these books just froth, or do they hold some kind of poison that becomes part of us? And what does our attraction to them say about us?